‘Analyzing and Evaluating’ Don McLeroy

by

Have you wondered how Texas State Board of Education Chairman Don McLeroy persuaded fellow board members last month to add an amendment weakening proposed science standards dealing with evolution? Well, here’s an interesting Web page put together by an enterprising fellow: “Collapse of a Texas Quote Mine.” The site looks at the many quotes from reputable sources that Dr. McLeroy used to justify calling into question common descent, a core concept of evolutionary theory. The site lists each of the quotes culled by McLeroy (or whoever provided his talking points) and explains how they were distorted and taken out of context in the cause of promoting pseudoscientific nonsense.

Here’s an example. The Web site notes that Dr. McLeroy cherry-picked this quote from Ernst Mayr’s What Evolution Is (2001):

…the various steps in the history of the change from ape to man … is entirely based on inferences and any part of it may be refuted at any time.

Sounds like skepticism about a key part of human evolution over time, yes? Well, Mayr certainly didn’t mean it to be. This is the quote in context from his book:

Yet, as far as the general trend in human evolution is concerned, the fossil record is of considerable assistance. By making use of the interpretations of numerous authors, but relying particularly on Stanley (1996) and Wrangham (2001), I am developing a sequence of historical narratives that reconstruct the various steps in the history of the change from ape to man. The resulting picture is entirely based on inferences and any part of it may be refuted at any time. But developing a cohesive story is far more instructive than merely compiling a list of unconnected facts. The most important certainty that has emerged from recent studies is that Homo sapiens is the end product of two major ecological shifts (habitat preference) of our hominid ancestors.

Of course, quote mining is intellectually dishonest, but it’s hardly a new tactic. Evolution deniers have been using it for long time now. So it’s good to see someone document the nonsense. Check it out here.

19 Responses to “‘Analyzing and Evaluating’ Don McLeroy”

  1. Der Rot Baron Says:

    Chairman Dr Don might be called intellectually dishonest, but you have to have an intellect first. Unfortunately for his daughter, who takes science in primary public education, whether its because of a failure of teaching (socialization) or inheritance, she gets short changed either way by her own father. See, evolution works. Ask Donna Garner.

  2. Wendell Franklin Wentz Says:

    The dentist sitting on the board knows as much about Science and Evolution as a rabbit knows about ping-pong. Amen. -Wendell Franklin Wentz

  3. Cheryl Shepherd-Adams Says:

    Interesting how no ID proponents have shown up to defend McLeroy’s distortions . . .

  4. Larry Fafarman Says:

    Don McLeroy’s amendment to the state science standards says,

    Analyze and evaluate the sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry to explain the sudden appearance, stasis and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record.

    The website “Collapse of a Texas Quote Mine” does not show how the above statement can be derived from any of McLeroy’s “quote mines.”

    As I said, state science standards have become a joke. IMO the best thing to do is forget about state standards and textbook selections. Local Texas school districts can choose state-unapproved textbooks if the districts pay the full cost, which isn’t much.

  5. Cheryl Shepherd-Adams Says:

    So Larry, do you support McLeroy’s quotemining or not? That’s an easy, binary choice right there . . .

  6. Ben Says:

    All of McLeroy’s “insufficiencies” come from lies, mined quotes, or other unreliable or deceptive sources.

  7. Larry Fafarman Says:

    Cheryl Shepherd-Adams said,
    –So Larry, do you support McLeroy’s quotemining or not? —

    I said nothing about that — all I said was that it appears that his amendment cannot be derived from the “quote mines.”

  8. Ben Says:

    Larry chickened out.

  9. Cheryl Shepherd-Adams Says:

    Larry, do you support McLeroy’s quotemining or not?

  10. Larry Fafarman Says:

    Cheryl Shepherd-Adams said,

    –Larry, do you support McLeroy’s quotemining or not?–

    IMO many of the quotes are not quote mines. But it was all pointless because none of the quotes supports McLeroy’s amendment. And the quotes are no substitute for public comments.

  11. Cheryl Shepherd-Adams Says:

    Thanks for playing, Larry. It’s obvious to us all that you don’t object to McLeroy’s quotemines, which were used by him to persuade his fellow board members to pass his amendment. The “Collapse” site makes this quite clear.

  12. Larry Fafarman Says:

    Cheryl Shepherd-Adams said,
    — It’s obvious to us all that you don’t object to McLeroy’s quotemines, which were used by him to persuade his fellow board members to pass his amendment. —

    That is an outrageous mischaracterization of what I said.

  13. Ben Says:

    Cheryl, please don’t confuse Larry with a bunch of facts.

  14. Cheryl Shepherd-Adams Says:

    I know, Ben. It’s just kinda amusing to see him try to duck the question.

  15. Larry Fafarman Says:

    It is even more amusing to see you folks try to twist my words.

    I did not duck anything. I said exactly what I think.

  16. Ben Says:

    Here are some things Larry has said on his blog:

    “…scientific evolution theory is sufficient to explain the diversity of life…”

    “…IMO the Dover school board made a mistake…”

    “…the Nazis used primitive IBM Hollerith-card machines to identify all the Jews of Europe…”

  17. Larry Fafarman Says:

    Ben said,

    “Larry, the funniest thing about you is that . . . . you are some sort of brilliant logical thinker.”

    “Larry, . . you have evidence for a weakness in the theory of evolution, please contact your nearest university and let them know. You’ll be famous.”

    “You get banned from blogs because you . . . understand the difference between fact and opinion, and you . . . distinguish between logic and faith. I see plenty of people who hold the same opinions as you do — and they . . . get banned from blogs.”

    “I have no problem appearing foolish”

    — from
    https://tfnblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/not-about-religion/#comments

    Anyone can quote mine, bozo.

  18. Ben Says:

    Larry said, “Anyone can quote mine, bozo.”

    That’s exactly the point I was hoping to make, Larry. Thanks for helping me make it.

    McLeroy and his pals are dishonest quoteminers.

  19. Voice in the Urbanness Says:

    Has anyone ever seen Larry answer a direct question anywhere? He is now heavily censoring his totally moderated blogs including his one man “Association of Non-Censoring Bloggers”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: